Preprint

Task-optimized neural networks reveal distinct contributions of specialized and broader visual learning to neural representations of face familiarity

Hamza Abdelhedi, Shahab Bakhtiari, Karim Jerbi

bioRxiv 2026

Abstract

How neural activity across the ventral visual hierarchy supports face recognition is an open question. A long-standing debate asks whether face processing, particularly in fusiform cortex, relies on face-specific computations or representations shared with broader visual recognition. Here we combine source-resolved magnetoencephalography (MEG) with task-optimized neural networks as controlled computational models of visual experience. Rather than manipulating long-term expertise in human observers, we systematically vary learning objective on the model side—what the networks are trained to recognize—while holding architecture and loss function constant within model comparisons. We then ask which learned representational geometries best align with neural responses, where and when. We measured millisecond-resolved brain-model alignment across V1, lateral occipital cortex (LOC) and fusiform cortex while participants viewed familiar, unfamiliar and scrambled faces. The same stimuli were presented to seven CNN architectures trained for face-identity recognition (FR), object-category recognition (OR) or object categorization including a face category (Dual), alongside untrained controls. Familiarity produced a stage-dependent dissociation: in LOC, familiar faces showed earlier brain-model alignment than unfamiliar faces in the M170 range, an effect most consistent in models trained for face-recognition, whereas broader objectives produced more variable, architecture-dependent peak alignment latencies. In fusiform cortex they showed stronger alignment around the M200 range. This fusiform advantage was not uniquely associated with face-recognition training: dual- and object-trained models showed greater fusiform correspondence than face-trained models. Together, these findings support stage-dependent specialization, with training for face-identity recognition constraining intermediate-stage timing while later fusiform representations remain compatible with representational structure acquired through broader visual computations.

Five-panel study-design diagram showing familiar, unfamiliar and scrambled face stimuli; MEG sensor and cortical source activity; CNNs trained for face identity, objects, or objects including faces; and brain and CNN dissimilarity matrices compared over time.

Comparing brain and task-optimized network representations. The study compares source-resolved MEG responses with seven CNN architectures trained on face identity, object categories, or object categories including faces, alongside untrained controls. Representational similarity analysis compares brain and network dissimilarity matrices for the same stimuli across time and network layers. This figure explains the design rather than the measured familiarity effects.

Abdelhedi, Bakhtiari and Jerbi (2026) · bioRxiv v1, Figure 1 · CC BY 4.0. Resized; full frame preserved.

View full-size figure

Citation

BibTeX